President Lula (PT) sanctioned, on Tuesday (24/03), the bill known as the “Anti-Faction Bill,” which establishes a new legal framework for combating organized crime in Brazil. The president chose to veto only two provisions of the text approved by Congress. The new legislation sets guidelines for confronting criminal factions, including strengthening investigative capabilities, increasing prison sentences in some cases from 20 to 40 years, establishing deadlines for investigations, and creating mechanisms to block assets and redirect seized resources to federal and state public security funds.
This Content Is Only For Subscribers
To unlock this content, subscribe to INTERLIRA Reports.
Sections vetoed
Lula decided to veto two specific provisions of the bill approved by the National Congress. One of them proposed extending penalties applied to members of criminal factions to individuals involved in actions that could be considered equivalent to those carried out by organized crime groups. According to the Planalto Palace, this measure could open the door to the criminalization of social movements and public protests. The government argued that the provision distorts the structure of the bill by penalizing conduct already classified as criminal under existing laws, even when committed by individuals not formally linked to criminal organizations. It also stated that the measure would excessively broaden the scope of the Penal Code—intended as a last resort—and could create legal uncertainty while discouraging the exercise of fundamental rights.
Loss of Federal Revenue
Another vetoed provision involved the redistribution of assets and products seized from organized crime to funds managed by states and the Federal District, which would result in a loss of federal revenue. According to the government’s justification, the measure is contrary to the public interest because it reduces federal resources at a time when there may be increased demand on the National Public Security Fund. The Executive also argued that the proposal is unconstitutional, as it reallocates revenue currently designated exclusively for the Union to other levels of government without presenting an estimate of the financial and budgetary impact.
Project Generated Conflicts
Public security remains a sensitive issue for the Lula administration, particularly as right-wing groups maintain an advantage with voters on this topic. In an election year, the government is expected to prioritize this agenda, which is considered one of the main concerns among Brazilians. The proposal gained momentum following a large-scale police operation in the Penha and Alemão complexes in Rio de Janeiro, which resulted in 121 deaths in October of last year. In response to the public reaction, the government accelerated the submission of the bill to Congress, amid pressure to take a more active role in the national debate on security. At the same time, the Planalto Palace advanced other proposals, including tougher penalties for criminal organizations and renewed support for the so-called Security Amendment. The drafting and approval process of the Anti-Faction Bill was marked by disagreements between the government and the opposition, as well as internal resistance and revisions within both the Executive and Legislative branches.
Government Coordination
Negotiations intensified over several months, with successive modifications to the bill to ensure its approval in Congress. The Chamber of Deputies approved a version that differed from the government’s original proposal, while the Federal Senate later reinstated provisions aligned with the Planalto Palace’s priorities. The final text sanctioned by President Lula introduces a new criminal classification, increases penalties, establishes specific deadlines for investigations, and strengthens legal tools aimed at critically weakening criminal organizations. However, the proposal to tax betting activities to fund public security initiative strongly supported by the government—was ultimately excluded from the final version due to significant political disagreement.
Analysis:
The sanctioning of the Anti-Faction Bill by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva represents a significant recalibration of Brazil’s legal framework for combating organized crime, reflecting both institutional learning and political pressure. By introducing clearer criminal classifications, stricter penalties, and enhanced mechanisms for asset seizure and financial disruption, the law moves toward a more structured and intelligence-driven approach to dismantling criminal organizations. This shift acknowledges that modern factions operate not only through violence but also through complex financial and logistical networks, requiring legal tools that go beyond traditional policing and address the economic foundations of organized crime.
At the same time, the presidential vetoes reveal an effort to balance enforcement with constitutional safeguards. The rejection of provisions that could extend organized crime penalties to loosely defined or analogous conduct signals concerns over legal overreach and the potential criminalization of legitimate social activity. Similarly, the veto on redistributing seized assets highlights ongoing tensions within Brazil’s federal structure, particularly regarding resource allocation between national and subnational authorities in the area of public security.
Sources: A Folha de SP; CNN Brasil; G1; Carta Capital; Agência Brasil.
